- There are already 16 antennae on the Tower and ``enough is
enough''.
- The proposed development would fail to preserve the character of the
listed building, its features of special architectural and historic
interest and its setting.
- The antennae cannot match the colour and texture of sandstone. Paint
will not last nor match the architectural features of the Water Tower.
- The presence of existing telecommunications equipment on the Tower does
not establish a precedent for further telecommunications equipment to be
sited on the Water Tower.
- Granting this application will open the floodgates to all other mobile
phone companies possibly resulting in 35 antennae on the Tower within a
year.
- Orange have failed to demonstrate why all other alternative sites
would be unsuitable and why the need for this site should override the
community's fears and concerns.
- The proposed development is not wanted by the local community and not
needed by Orange to fulfil their license commitments.
- Local community fears of adverse health effects, even when the ICNIRP
guidelines are not exceeded, should be considered. At least an explanation
should be given as to why it is appropriate for masts to be built so close
to schools and housing.
We would also like to offer the Inspector access to local residents'
property so they can see the dominance of the Tower from above street level.
Finally, could you confirm that you have received this letter and send a
copy (or, preferably, four copies) of the final appeal decision.
- Flaybrick Appeal Decision.
- Borough Solicitors Letter.
Your sincerely,
Dr. Ian McConnell,
on behalf of the Tower Action Group.
